Cuspal foundation
House cusps and sub-lords own the event logic.
Method identityT-047 · method fidelity
Next useful moveContinue to Jaimini↗KP · named evidence system · केपी
Ask the exact question.
Follow the exact chain.
THE KP ASTROLOGY VIEW
KP is not Parashari with smaller divisions. Its event-oriented reasoning depends on cuspal and significator logic implemented on its own terms.
01KP evidence anatomy
Follow the method
from input to limit.
Each layer exposes the question it owns, the input it requires, the operation it performs, the evidence it returns and the boundary it cannot cross.
NAMED METHODKP astrologyKP
DELIVERYOperational coreLimited access
EVIDENCE RULEShow the chainInputs · operation · evidence · limit
LAYER 01 · Question · houses
Define the event promise
Which houses signify the event being asked about?
- Required input
- One precise question and its relevant house set
- Operation
- Declare primary, supporting and negating houses before judging planets.
- Visible evidence
- The question-to-house contract remains visible.
- Limit
- A vague question produces a vague house contract.
LAYER 02 · Cusps
Inspect cuspal authority
Which cusp and sub-lord govern the event?
- Required input
- Verified time, coordinates and KP calculation context
- Operation
- Compute cusp, sign lord, star lord and sub-lord chain.
- Visible evidence
- Cuspal hierarchy is shown without importing Parashari shortcuts.
- Limit
- Birth-time sensitivity must remain explicit.
LAYER 03 · Significators
Build the testimony set
Which planets actually signify the required houses?
- Required input
- Occupancy, ownership, stellar and sub-lord relationships
- Operation
- Rank significators through the declared KP hierarchy.
- Visible evidence
- Inclusion and exclusion can be traced to a rule.
- Limit
- A planet is not supportive merely because it looks benefic elsewhere.
LAYER 04 · Ruling planets · timing
Resolve event and window
Does the significator chain permit the event, and when?
- Required input
- Promise chain, dasha sequence, ruling planets and transit
- Operation
- Converge event permission with period and trigger evidence.
- Visible evidence
- Promise and timing remain separate before synthesis.
- Limit
- Precision does not equal certainty.
02Four identity tests
Depth begins where
generic labels end.
KP astrology remains legible through the exact concepts and limits that distinguish its reasoning.
Significator hierarchy
Planets are ranked through a declared chain.
Question discipline
The exact event is framed before calculation.
Separate grammar
KP is not silently blended into Parashari synthesis.
केपी
The method becomes stronger
when its limit stays visible.
KP can organize precise event testimony, but it cannot guarantee an event, excuse weak birth data or turn timing into coercive certainty.
04Topic cluster · Method identity
Where this method connects.
Why named traditions must keep their own logic instead of blending.
RELATED METHODSTraditions this one is read against
BACKGROUND READINGExplainers this method depends on
CONTEXTUAL NEXT STEPS
Continue with the
right question.
This page is one instrument inside a larger system. Choose the path that extends the evidence you have just examined.